The Allocation Pillar: Goals Based Asset Allocation for High Net Worth Investors in Pennsylvania

Key Takeaways

• Allocation starts with purpose: The right portfolio is built around the life, obligations, opportunities, and legacy the capital is expected to support, not around a model allocation or an index.
• Location changes outcomes: Taxes, account type, trust ownership, and liquidity can materially change the value of the same investment exposure, which is why asset location belongs inside the allocation decision.
• The balance sheet is the portfolio: Business equity, concentrated stock, real estate, private investments, retirement accounts, trusts, and taxable assets should be evaluated together before risk is assigned to any one account.

A family can have a well diversified brokerage account and still have a poorly diversified financial life.

We see this most often with founders, business owners, and executives whose wealth extends far beyond marketable securities. Add business equity, trusts, real estate, private investments, and near term spending, and a conventional stock and bond allocation can tell only part of the story.

That is why the Allocation Pillar of our Atlas Framework focuses on the net of tax, net of fee, net of risk return, with the life the capital needs to fund serving as the benchmark. The five Atlas disciplines are applied together, because a decision that helps one area can create a tax, liquidity, estate, or succession problem elsewhere.

Below, we cover how goals, liquidity, taxes, asset location, concentrated wealth, and ownership structure come together in high net worth asset allocation.

What Goals Based Asset Allocation Means for High Net Worth Families

Asset allocation is usually described as percentages invested in stocks, bonds, cash, and alternatives. For a complex family, those percentages are better viewed as outputs of the planning process.

And when viewed that way, the order of operations changes. We generally do not begin by asking whether a client should own 60%, 70%, or 80% equities. We first determine what capital needs to remain liquid, what risks already exist elsewhere on the balance sheet, how assets are owned, and what the portfolio actually needs to earn. The allocation follows from those decisions.

Goals based asset allocation begins with what the capital must accomplish, from current spending and future purchases to private investment calls and multigenerational wealth. Before expected return enters the discussion, three questions usually matter more:

• What must be funded: Lifestyle spending, taxes, debt service, education, and other high priority obligations establish the capital that cannot be exposed to unnecessary risk.
• What may be funded: Second homes, new ventures, philanthropy, and family support can often tolerate more flexibility in timing or size.
• What may never be spent: Assets intended for trusts, heirs, or multigenerational wealth can have a much longer investment horizon than personal spending assets.

This is also where risk tolerance and risk capacity separate. A wealthy investor may be comfortable with volatility but have little financial reason to accept it if core objectives are already funded. For any portfolio the incremental risk of any investment must always have a defined purpose.

Example: A Total Balance Sheet

Consider a founder with $42 million of total assets, including $12 million in a taxable portfolio, $2 million in retirement accounts, $25 million of private company equity, and $3 million of commercial real estate. Over the next two years, the family expects to need $2.5 million for taxes, a home project, and existing private fund commitments.

If an advisor looks only at the $14 million of marketable securities, a growth oriented allocation may appear reasonable. The full balance sheet says something different. Nearly 60% of the family’s wealth is already concentrated in one operating company.

When that component is taken into account, the planning and portfolio construction change. We must now account for the macro risks of the family business, its growth potential, and then weigh that with public equities, fixed income and other private funds. Most importantly, when dealing with families with privately held businesses the way to build a portfolio changes.

The point is not to produce a universal allocation. The public portfolio should respond to risks and obligations that already exist elsewhere on the balance sheet.

Liquidity Sets the Boundaries of Asset Allocation

For many of the families we advise they have limited liquidity, but significant net worth. It’s an important distinction – liquidity and net worth are not interchangeable. A founder can be worth $50 million and still struggle to produce $500k quickly if most of the wealth is tied to a private company, real estate, or long duration investments.

Our Liquidity Pillar treats cash as a planning resource with specific jobs rather than a leftover percentage, and allocation should use the same discipline. Four demands should be identified before capital is committed to less liquid or more volatile assets:

• Known obligations: Taxes, spending, tuition, property purchases, debt payments, and planned gifts should not depend on favorable market conditions.
• Investment commitments: Private equity, venture capital, private credit, and real estate funds can call capital on schedules the investor does not control.
• Business optionality: Owners may need cash for an acquisition, working capital, a partner buyout, or another venture.
• Contingency capacity: A reserve for unexpected needs reduces the chance that long term assets must be sold at an unfavorable time.

Excess cash can also create long term opportunity cost, so the goal is sufficient liquidity rather than maximum liquidity. Private investments should be judged by expected return, risk, overlap, commitment pacing, and the family’s ability to tolerate long holding periods.

Tax Efficient Asset Allocation Focuses on What You Keep

For high net worth investors, gross return can be a poor basis for comparison. Different forms of investment income receive different federal tax treatment, and the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax can apply once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 for single filers or $250,000 for married couples filing jointly (in 2026).

Taxes belong inside portfolio construction rather than as a year-end cleanup exercise, which is the same principle behind our broader tax efficient wealth management approach. Several forms of tax drag can change the allocation decision:

• Income character: Two investments with similar expected returns can produce different after tax outcomes depending on how those returns are generated.
• Turnover: A strategy that realizes gains frequently may need a higher pretax return to produce the same spendable result as a more tax efficient strategy.
• Embedded gains: Refusing to rebalance solely to avoid taxes can leave the family with a larger concentration risk than the tax savings justify.
• Fixed income taxation: Taxable bonds, municipal bonds, and Treasury securities should be compared using after tax yield and portfolio role, not headline yield alone.

Pennsylvania currently levies personal income tax at 3.07% and separates taxable income into eight classes, including compensation, interest, dividends, and net gains from property dispositions. A loss in one class generally cannot offset income in another, and gains or losses generally cannot be carried backward or forward between tax years.

The Commonwealth also exempts interest from certain Pennsylvania and U.S. government obligations. Pennsylvania also classifies capital gain distributions from regulated investment companies as dividend income for state income tax purposes, another example of how state and federal tax characterization can differ.

The planning objective is not the lowest possible tax bill. It is the best after tax portfolio that still meets the family’s risk, liquidity, and diversification requirements.

Asset Location Can Matter as Much as What You Own

Asset allocation answers what economic exposures the family owns. Asset location answers which account, trust, or entity owns them.

For affluent families, that second question can affect taxes, rebalancing flexibility, spending access, and estate outcomes.

Here’s a breakdown of it all:

Taxable, Retirement, and Roth Accounts

Taxable accounts generally offer flexibility for spending, gifting, loss harvesting, and gain management, but embedded gains can make future rebalancing expensive. Traditional retirement accounts generally defer tax on earnings until distribution, while qualified Roth IRA distributions are generally tax free.

Simple rules such as putting bonds in retirement accounts and stocks in taxable accounts can fail, because they ignore withdrawal strategy, expected returns, account size, estate goals, and future tax rates. We generally evaluate location across three dimensions:

• Tax efficiency: Higher turnover or income producing strategies may benefit from tax advantaged space, while taxable accounts can favor exposures with more control over gain realization.
• Growth value: Assets with greater expected appreciation may be especially valuable in Roth accounts, because qualified distributions are tax free.
• Access: Capital expected to fund near term goals usually belongs in structures where it can be reached without creating unnecessary tax or distribution constraints.

Trusts Are Different Portfolios for a Reason

A trust may have different beneficiaries, distribution standards, tax characteristics, time horizons, and estate objectives from the person who created it. The trust portfolio should reflect the trust’s purpose, not automatically mirror the grantor’s personal account.

Three questions are particularly important:

• Who needs the capital: A trust designed for current distributions has a different liquidity profile than one intended to compound across generations.
• How is income taxed: Grantor status, trust residency, beneficiary distributions, and income character can influence the after tax result.
• What is the trust meant to accomplish: Asset protection, estate exclusion, family support, and long term compounding can imply different portfolio roles.

This is where Architecture and Allocation intersect. Ownership can influence tax treatment, liquidity, governance, and transfer outcomes, which is why trust investment policy should be coordinated with the trustee and the family’s estate, tax, and investment advisors.

Business Ownership and Concentrated Wealth Change the Allocation Math

Founders and business owners often carry substantial equity risk before a dollar is invested in public markets. Diversification inside the brokerage account does not solve that problem if the rest of the balance sheet points in the same direction.

Five exposures deserve to be included when the family’s overall risk is measured:

• Operating company equity: A closely held business is part of the family’s economic portfolio even when it is absent from the custodial statement.
• Employer equity: RSUs, stock options, and other forms of equity compensation can compound the same company and industry exposure that already drives compensation.
• Real estate: Direct property, private real estate funds, and public real estate securities can overlap more than separate account statements suggest.
• Private funds: Private equity and venture funds may own companies in sectors already represented elsewhere in the family portfolio.
• Human capital: Salary, bonus, deferred compensation, and business distributions can all depend on the same economic risks as the investment assets.

Around a business sale, the portfolio should preserve flexibility for taxes and transaction uncertainty. After closing, the balance sheet can change enough that the allocation should be rebuilt from the ground up rather than simply scaled up from the pre-sale portfolio.

Manage the Family as One Balance Sheet

The practical objective is one household level risk budget, with each account and entity assigned a role. The Atlas Framework is built around this coordination:

• Architecture: Titling, trusts, entities, and beneficiary design determine where assets can be held and how they can be transferred.
• Taxation: The character, timing, and location of returns affect what the family actually keeps.
• Liquidity: Near term obligations establish how much capital can responsibly be exposed to volatility or illiquidity.
• Allocation: Public markets, private investments, cash, and concentrated wealth are coordinated around one economic risk budget.
• Succession: Capital intended for heirs can have a different horizon and distribution objective than assets meant to support current spending, a distinction we explore further in family governance planning.

An effective investment policy should define allocation ranges, liquidity minimums, concentration limits, private market pacing, asset location principles, tax management parameters, and review triggers such as a business sale, retirement, inheritance, major gift, or trust funding. It should create discipline without becoming static.

Final Takeaway

High net worth asset allocation is ultimately a coordination problem. A strong portfolio on paper can still fail if too much capital is illiquid, taxes are ignored, ownership is poorly structured, or the brokerage account duplicates risks already embedded elsewhere.

The better starting point is the life the wealth is meant to support. Once that is clear, allocation becomes less about finding the theoretically optimal portfolio and more about deciding where risk belongs, where liquidity is needed, where assets should be owned, and what each dollar of capital is ultimately expected to accomplish.

If you want to see how these principles would apply to your own balance sheet, our investment management team can walk through what a coordinated allocation looks like for your family.

Frequently Asked Questions

Please read important disclosures here.